Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 29;105(40):15475–15480. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802343105

Table 1.

Cichlid fecundities and egg diameters differed significantly between habitats and lakes

Effect Number of eggs
Egg diameter
F df P F df P
Habitat 38.61 2, 123 < 0.001 15.711 2, 115 < 0.001
Lake 16.06 2, 123 < 0.001 24.243 2, 115 < 0.001
Lake × habitat 1.55 4, 119     0.193 16.437 4, 115 < 0.001
Body mass 120.8 1, 119 < 0.001 6.450 1, 115 0.012

The relationships between egg diameter and habitat varied between lakes (analyses of covariance).