Skip to main content
. 2005 Sep 9;43(4):371–377. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.035451

Table 5 Prevalence of visceral manifestations in men and women after exclusion of the proband of each family (first patient referred and ascertained) in order to correct for possible referral bias.

Men Women p
HHT1
 PAVM 50/132 (37.9%) 83/168 (49.4%) 0.046 (pc = 0.23)
 CAVM 13/101 (12.9%) 18/124 (14.5%) 0.72 (NS)
 CAVM + PAVM 5/97 (5.2%) 11/121 (9.1%) 0.35 (NS)
 HAVM 0/50 (0%) 9/69 (13.0%) 0.008 (pc = 0.04)
 GI telangiectasia 20/29 (69%) 24/33 (72.7%) NS (NS)
HHT2
 PAVM 1/39 (2.6%) 2/49 (4.1%) 0.70 (NS)
 CAVM 0/20 (0%) 1/30 (3.3%) 0.41 (NS)
 CAVM + PAVM 0/19 0/26 NS (NS)
 HAVM 2/9 (22.2%) 6/12 (50%) 0.19 (NS)
 GI telangiectasia 8/11 (72.7%) 4/7 (57.1%) NS (NS)

Patients with a doubtful result were not included in the analysis. Denominators varied between categories because not all patients underwent all examinations for all visceral organs. The statistical analysis was performed comparing men and women. The p values are shown, with p values after correction for multiple testing in brackets