Table 3 Advantages and disadvantages of the multiple techniques used to diagnose segmental aneuploidies.
Method | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QPCR | PSQ | FISH | Microsatellites | Southern | ||||||
Speed (days) | 1 | 1 | 5 (2)* | 1 | 6 | |||||
Cost per assay (€) | 30 | 10 | 80 | 15/30/45†‡ | 80 | |||||
Advantages | Great adaptability to uncommon rearrangement§ | Possibility of diagnosing inversion¶ | Possibility of diagnosing inversion | |||||||
Disadvantages | Inversion impossible to diagnose | Relies on paralogous sequences; impossible to diagnose inversion | Labour intensive | Relative informativeness of SNPs; discovery of non‐paternity; impossible to diagnose inversion | Requires working with radioactivity**; labour intensive |
*A preliminary result can be given after two days.
†Price for QF‐PCR.
‡€45/assay includes both parents.
§See, for example, the mapping of breakpoints of atypical deletion patient detailed in this report.
¶By three colour FISH (see, for example, Bayes et al, 200317).
**Possibility of working with non‐radioactive digoxygenin, but with a diminished sensitivity.
FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation; PSQ, paralogous sequence quantification; QPCR, quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.