Skip to main content
. 2005 Jul 1;43(3):266–273. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.034009

Table 3 Advantages and disadvantages of the multiple techniques used to diagnose segmental aneuploidies.

Method
QPCR PSQ FISH Microsatellites Southern
Speed (days) 1 1 5 (2)* 1 6
Cost per assay (€) 30 10 80 15/30/45†‡ 80
Advantages Great adaptability to uncommon rearrangement§ Possibility of diagnosing inversion¶ Possibility of diagnosing inversion
Disadvantages Inversion impossible to diagnose Relies on paralogous sequences; impossible to diagnose inversion Labour intensive Relative informativeness of SNPs; discovery of non‐paternity; impossible to diagnose inversion Requires working with radioactivity**; labour intensive

*A preliminary result can be given after two days.

†Price for QF‐PCR.

‡€45/assay includes both parents.

§See, for example, the mapping of breakpoints of atypical deletion patient detailed in this report.

¶By three colour FISH (see, for example, Bayes et al, 200317).

**Possibility of working with non‐radioactive digoxygenin, but with a diminished sensitivity.

FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation; PSQ, paralogous sequence quantification; QPCR, quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.