Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Oct 8.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 18;35(1):396–405. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.051

Table 2.

The number of regions significantly different between “continuous” resting state data and the experimental data for each seed region. Regions statistically different are subdivided by A) region of interest (rows) and B) the type of interaction (i.e. both groups have an absolute z – score above 3 with a relative difference, one group has a z – score above 3 but the other does not, or both have highly significant absolute z - scores above 3 but originally with opposite signs).

Interleaved (I) vs rest (R) Event related residuals (E) vs rest (R) Simulated interleaved (SI) vs rest (R)
Seed Regions I > 3 R > 3 I < 3 R > 3 I > 3 R < 3 I > 3 R > 3 opp. signs E > 3 R > 3 E < 3 R > 3 E > 3 R < 3 E > 3 R > 3 opp. signs SI > 3 R > 3 SI < 3 R > 3 SI > 3 R < 3 SI > 3 R > 3 opp. signs
ROI 1: −49, 8, 1 0 3 2 0 2 23 1 0 2 2 0 0
ROI 2: −40, −4, 34 0 4 1 1 1 7 23 1 0 0 0 0
ROI 3: −9, −70, −11 0 3 2 0 0 15 13 6 1 2 1 0
ROI 4: 39, −3, 33 1 5 0 0 1 5 13 1 0 2 0 0
ROI 5: 16, −35, 52 0 6 1 0 2 9 4 1 1 3 1 0
Total 1 21 6 1 6 59 54 9 4 9 2 0
Additional seed region analyzed on event-related data without any task induced activity
−1, 47, −4 - - - - 1 27 9 0 - - - -