Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Oct 8.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Phys Lett. 2005 Dec 26;87(26):263902. doi: 10.1063/1.2149979

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3

Comparison of separation performance in three different nanofluidic chips. Chip1 has only a 60nm thin, flat channel without any nanofilter. Chip2: ds=60nm, dd=560nm, L=4μm; Chip3: ds=60nm, dd=300nm, L=1μm. Band assignment is the same as in Fig. 2 for SDS-protein complexes. The separation lengths and the applied fields are indicated in the figures.