Table 2. Locations of the 14 multi-locus genotypes found at more than one site.

Locations	Linear distance between sites (km)2	Probability of the multi-locus genotype being produced by sexual reproduction in each of the populations1
Davies 1, Davies 3	0.887	0.0096, 8.5×10−7
Davies 1, Davies 2	1.925	0.0010, 4.3×10−17
Myrmidon, Sudbury 2, Emily	346.616 (M-E), 166.161 (S-E), 184.056 (M-S)	0.0003, 0.0042, 6.3×10−13
Sudbury 1, Sudbury 2	10.950	0.0001, 7.4×10−6
Sudbury 2, Tongue 2	92.615	0.0002, 1.5×10−6
Sudbury 2, Tongue 2	92.615	0.0001, 0.0126
Sudbury 2, Tongue 2	92.615	0.0136, 0.0002
Sudbury 2, Tongue 2, Emily	92.615 (S-T), 166.161 (S-E), 75.663 (T-E)	0.0005, 0.0004, 1.1×10−5
Sudbury 2, Tongue 1	90.102	0.0002, 4.7×10−5
Sudbury 2, Tongue 1	90.102	0.0110, 0.0006
Sudbury 2, Emily	166.161	1.9×10−5, 1. 6×10−7
Tongue 1, Tongue 2	2.513	3.3×10−5, 0.0001
Tongue 1, Ribbon 8	133.781	5.4×10−5, 3.3×10−8
Tongue 1, Ribbon 10	154.086	0.0034, 0.0003

¹The probabilities of the multi-locus genotypes being produced by sexual reproduction in each of the populations was calculated in GENCLONE 2.0 [48] and shows that it is highly unlikely that any of these genotypes was produced twice or three times by sexual reproduction at different locations. Only genotypes with no missing data (13) or data for only a single locus missing (1) were used.

Geographic distances are calculated from a MGA zone 55 projection.