Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Oct 9.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Psycholinguist. 2008;29(4):689–722. doi: 10.1017/S0142716408080296

Table 3.

Results from the Multivariate Multilevel Analysis for ESL and TDL1 for the Auxiliary and Inflectional Composite Scores

Full Model

Variable Group Coefficient Stan. Err. t-value df Prob
INF .1743 .049 3.61 22.7 .0015
AUX .5691 .044 13.07 23.4 <.0001
INF*GROUP TDL1 .2700 .083 3.25 37 .0025
INF*GROUP ESL 0 - - - -
AUX*GROUP TDL1 -0.028 .074 -.38 37.8 .709
AUX*GROUP ESL 0 - - - -
Deviance (-2 Log likelihood) = -4.5 Number of Parameters = 4
Reduced Model

Variable Group Coefficient Stan. Err. t-value df Prob.
INF .2283 .047 4.90 26.3 <.0001
AUX .5310 .043 12.46 25.3 <.0001
GROUP TDL1 .0897 .066 1.36 27.4 .1819
GROUP ESL 0 - - - -
Deviance (-2 Log likelihood) = 6.3 Number of Parameters = 3

Difference in Deviances = 10.8 Difference in number of parameters = 1

Note.

The coefficients in the full model are interpreted as follows:

INF: Estimated mean of INF for the reference group (ESL)

AUX: Estimated mean of AUX for the reference group (ESL)

INF*GROUP: Estimated difference of INF for the TDL1 group compared to the ESL reference group; i.e., estimated mean for TDL1 is .1743 + .2700.

AUX*GROUP: Estimated difference of AUX for the TDL1 group compared to the ESL reference group; i.e., estimated mean for TDL1 is .5691 - 0.028.

The coefficients in the reduced model are interpreted as follows:

INF: Estimated mean of INF for the reference group (ESL)

AUX: Estimated mean of AUX for the reference group (ESL)

GROUP: Estimated difference for the TDL1 group compared to the ESL reference group for either variable; i.e., estimated mean for TDL1 group for INF is .2283 +.0897, and for AUX, the estimate is .5310 + .0897.