TABLE 5.
The QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) assessment tool
| Item | Yes | No | Unclear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Was the spectrum of patients representative of the patients who will receive the test in practice? | |||
| 2. | Were selection criteria clearly described? | |||
| 3. | Is the reference standard likely to classify the target condition correctly? | |||
| 4. | Is the period between reference standard and index test short enough to be reasonably sure that the target condition did not change between the two tests? | |||
| 5. | Did the whole sample or random selection of the sample receive verification using a reference standard of diagnosis? | |||
| 6. | Did patients receive the same reference standard regardless of the index test result? | |||
| 7. | Was the reference standard independent of the index test (i.e., the index test did not form part of the reference standard)? | |||
| 8. | Was the execution of the index test described in sufficient detail to permit its replication? | |||
| 9. | Was the execution of the reference standard described in sufficient detail to permit its replication? | |||
| 10. | Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference test? | |||
| 11. | Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test? | |||
| 12. | Were the same clinical data available when test results were interpreted as would be available when the test is used in practice? | |||
| 13. | Were uninterpretable/intermediate test results reported? | |||
| 14. | Were withdrawals from the study explained? | |||