Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 27;2(8):e282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000282

Table 1. Presence of the URE3 matrix in the promoters of genes modulated by a dominant positive URE3-BP.

Promoters which did not contain a URE3 matrix Promoters containing a URE3 matrix 375-25 bases 5′ of ATG start codon Total Number of Promoters analyzed % Statistical significance
Transcripts significantly modulated by URE3-BP 23 27 50 54 p<0.0001
All E. histolytica promoters 6527 1985 8522 23
Promoters with multiple URE3
Promoters which did not contain at least 2 URE3 matrices
Transcripts significantly modulated by URE3-BP 40 10 50 20 p = 0.0031
All E. histolytica promoters 7862 660 8522 8
Motif Frequency in Promoters
Nonamers not in motif URE3 motifs potential motifs (sequence divided by motif length 9 bp)
Transcripts significantly modulated by URE3-BP 1905 39 1944.4 2 p = 0.0025
All E. histolytica promoters 327360 4051 331411 1.2

A contingency table χ2 test was used to compare the occurrence of the URE3 motif in transcripts significantly modulated by URE3 (the numbers were to large for the Fishers exact test). The motif background in all E. histolytica promoters was determined using a custom motif search script. To clearly illustrate the data we show the analysis on a promoter basis, and motif frequency per sequence nonamer.