Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 9.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Pharmacol. 2008 Mar 29;587(1-3):147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.03.020

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

(+)-Morphine microinjected into the posterior nucleus accumbens shell does not have any effect on the conditioned place preference. After completion of the preconditioning measurement on the 1st day, groups of rats were place conditioned after microinjection with different doses of (+)-morphine (3, 10 or 100 pg) or vehicle into the posterior nucleus accumbens shell twice a day for three days. The post-conditioning was measured on the 5th day. Each column represents the mean of the conditioned place preference score and the vertical bar represents the S.E.M.; n = 7–13 rats. Paired t test was used to compare production of conditioned place preference of individual dose: For the group of rats microinjected with vehicle or 3, 10 or 100 pg of (+)-morphine, t = 0.6, 1.7, 1.8 and 1.5 df = 12, 7, 7 and 9, respectively. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post-test was used to test difference between groups; F(3, 34) = 0.267.