. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Oct 13.

Published in final edited form as: J Proteome Res. 2006 Sep;5(9):2405–2416. doi: 10.1021/pr060215t

Table 1.

Experimental approaches used in this study

Separation	Mass Spectrometry	Label	Virus/Target	Purpose	Time points (hours)	Figure
1D-nano LC/MS	ESI-ion trap	None	Measles virus proteins	Viral protein expression levels	0, 18, 72	1
1D-capillary LC/MS	ESI-TOF	None	Measles virus proteins	Relative protein quantitation	0, 18, 72	1
None	DIOS	¹⁶O/¹⁸O	FHV proteins α,B2,A expression kinetic	Viral protein expression kinetics	0,4,8, 12, 16, 20, 22, 24	2
1D-nanoLC	ESI-ion trap	¹⁶O/¹⁸O	FHV proteins α,B2,A expression kinetics	Viral protein expression kinetics	0,4,8,12, 16, 20, 22, 24	3
2D-nanoLC	FT-MS	cICAT	FHV/Untargeted cellular proteins	Cellular protein expression changes	0,8	4,5
1D-microLC/MS	ESI-TOF	None	FHV/Untargeted small molecules (100–1000 m/z)	Small molecule changes in response to viral infection	0,12	6