Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2008 Apr;11(2):113–121. doi: 10.1080/10255840701336653

Table 2.

Reconstructed prostate dimensions from five individuals and results of anisotropic bubble packing evaluated with bioheat transfer simulation, where VP is the prostate volume, LP is the prostate length, LV2 is the distance from the apex of the prostate to a plane splitting the volume of the prostate into two segments having identical volumes, LS is the optimal insertion depth of cryoprobes, and the defect is presented in comparison with the overall prostate volume.

Patient Prostate
Dimensions
# of
Probes
Insertion Depth,
LS, mm (LS/LP)
Defect % Bubble
Packing
Runtime, sec
Bioheat
Simulation
Runtime, sec
A VP = 44.4 ml
LP = 44.5
LV2 = 26 ml
4 26 (0.59) 40.6 19 174
6 24 (0.54) 35.1 22 77
8 26 (0.59) 29.5 27 60
10 27 (0.61) 23.8 34 54
12 26 (0.59) 26.6 10 53
14 27 (0.61) 26.5 8 51

B VP = 62.8 ml
LP = 49.9
LV2 = 28 mm
4 33 (0.66) 49.5 17 401
6 33 (0.66) 34.7 25 188
8 31 (0.62) 28.4 31 117
10 28 (0.56) 24.7 35 106
12 29 (0.58) 26.0 43 90
14 29 (0.58) 26.5 7 86

C VP = 23.0 ml
LP = 37.2
LV2 = 23 mm
4 24 (0.65) 49.0 24 61
6 24 (0.65) 32.7 25 38
8 24 (0.65) 30.7 29 30
10 25 (0.68) 31.0 5 26
12 25 (0.68) 33.7 5 24
14 25 (0.68) 34.5 6 25

D VP = 73.6 ml
LP = 52.9 mm
LV2 = 27 mm
4 29 (0.56) 55.7 19 513
6 29 (0.56) 30.3 23 367
8 27 (0.52) 26.2 26 172
10 27 (0.52) 27.2 31 130
12 28 (0.54) 26.4 34 112
14 28 (0.54) 28.4 7 120

E VP = 42.8 ml
LP = 47.0 mm
LV2 = 28 mm
4 29 (0.63) 43.2 19 197
6 28 (0.61) 33.7 24 88
8 27 (0.58) 27.3 26 66
10 27 (0.58) 27.2 30 52
12 29 (0.63) 28.8 43 53
14 27 (0.58) 31.0 6 46