Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct;180(2):977–993. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.092221

TABLE 4.

SNP simulation results

True: Balancing selection
Neutral
Directional selection
Classified: Bal. Neut. Direc. Bal. Neut. Direc. Bal. Neut. Direc.
Pop-2 0 (0) 100 (98) 0 (2) 0 (0) 799 (743) 1 (57) 0 (0) 86 (62) 14 (38)
Pop-6a 58 (73) 42 (26) 0 (1) 34 (44) 751 (714) 15 (42) 0 (0) 39 (29) 61 (71)
Pop-10 82 (85) 18 (13) 0 (2) 31 (44) 747 (719) 22 (37) 0 (0) 18 (11) 82 (89)
Pop-20 97 (98) 3 (2) 0 (0) 25 (40) 756 (728) 19 (32) 0 (0) 8 (7) 92 (93)
Fst-0.05 10 (25) 90 (74) 0 (1) 10 (34) 772 (728) 18 (38) 0 (0) 27 (18) 73 (82)
Fst-0.10 33 (49) 67 (50) 0 (1) 22 (39) 763 (720) 15 (41) 0 (0) 38 (28) 62 (72)
Fst-0.15a 58 (73) 42 (26) 0 (1) 34 (44) 751 (714) 15 (42) 0 (0) 39 (29) 61 (71)
Fst-0.25 62 (76) 38 (23) 0 (1) 34 (51) 756 (701) 10 (48) 0 (0) 32 (17) 68 (83)
Size-15 32 (52) 68 (47) 0 (1) 14 (33) 772 (729) 14 (38) 0 (0) 32 (25) 68 (75)
Size-30a 58 (73) 42 (26) 0 (1) 34 (44) 751 (714) 15 (42) 0 (0) 39 (29) 61 (71)
Size-50 61 (78) 39 (22) 0 (0) 31 (51) 741 (710) 28 (39) 0 (0) 22 (17) 78 (83)
Size-100 61 (76) 39 (24) 0 (0) 30 (52) 745 (711) 25 (37) 0 (0) 25 (22) 75 (78)

Numbers of SNP loci simulated under (“true”) balancing selection, neutrality, and directional selection that were classified in each category using a reversible-jump cutoff of 0.86 (0.79) that give false-positive rates of 5% (10%) are shown. Bal., balancing selection; Neut., neutrality; Direc., directional selection.

a

These data sets represent the same reference data set that is replicated in the table to make comparisons between results.