TABLE 6.
Simulation results when 10% of the loci are subjected to selection
| True: | Balancing selection
|
Neutral
|
Directional selection
|
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classified: | Bal. | Neut. | Direc. | Bal. | Neut. | Direc. | Bal. | Neut. | Direc. | |
| AFPLs 10% | 18 (31) | 32 (19) | 0 (0) | 11 (49) | 861 (802) | 28 (49) | 0 (0) | 17 (15) | 33 (35) | |
| AFLPs 20% | 37 (60) | 63 (40) | 0 (0) | 20 (61) | 758 (702) | 22 (37) | 0 (0) | 29 (28) | 71 (72) | |
| SNPs 10% | 28 (38) | 22 (12) | 0 (0) | 26 (48) | 856 (911) | 18 (41) | 0 (0) | 19 (11) | 31 (39) | |
| SNPs 20% | 58 (73) | 42 (26) | 0 (1) | 34 (44) | 751 (714) | 15 (42) | 0 (0) | 39 (29) | 61 (71) | |
| SSRs 10% | 50 (50) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 22 (5) | 866 (891) | 12 (4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 50 (50) | |
| SSRs 20% | 100 (98) | 0 (2) | 0 (0) | 20 (7) | 764 (788) | 16 (5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 100 (100) | |
Numbers of AFLP, SNP, and microsatellite loci simulated under (“true”) balancing selection, neutrality, and directional selection that were classified in each category using reversible-jump cutoff values given in Tables 3–5 are shown. The results for the simulations with 20% of selected loci in the genome are also shown. Bal., balancing selection; Neut., neutrality; Direc., directional selection.