Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Oct 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neurocase. 2006 Jun;12(3):136–145. doi: 10.1080/13554790600598782

Table 2.

Summary of semantic scores (percent correct unless specified)

Tasks performed Patient AM Control subjects
Fluency*
Semantic (6 categories) 43a    117a
Lexical (3 categories) 27a 39a (+/−12)
Word retrieval*
Graded Difficulty Naming Test (N = 30)  16.7 ‘Low average’ range
Snodgrass pictures (N = 130)  74.6
Semantic categories (N = 70)  32.8      99
Colours (N = 10) 100     100
Classification*
Words (N = 70)  80     100
Pictures (N = 70)  81.4     100
Matching
Name-to-picture (N = 40) 100      97
Semantic associations*
Pyramid and Palm Tree Task (N = 52)  90.4      98.07
Semantic link 1 (N = 20)  80     100
Semantic link 2 (N = 20)  75      95
Semantic link 3 (N = 45)  66.6      95.6
Semantic features*
Definition of words and concepts (N = 70)  62.8     100
Objects' functions (N = 20)  60     100
Similarities (N = 26)  61.5      96.1
Differences (N = 26)  38.4      92.3

Notes:

a

Total items produced for all categories

*

Significantly different from normal controls (fluency [X2 = 3.99, p<.001]; word retrieval [X2 = 5.62, p<.001]; classification [X2 = 8.78, p<.001]; semantic associations [X2 = 4.6, p<.001]; semantic features [X2 = 3.64 p<.001].