Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Oct 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neurocase. 2006 Jun;12(3):136–145. doi: 10.1080/13554790600598782

Table 3.

Summary of numerical scores (percent correct; standard deviation in brackets)

Tasks performed Patient AM Control subjects
Non-verbal numerical tasks
Dot seriation (N = 18) 100 100
Dot magnitude comparison (N = 18) 100 100
Number recognition (N = 36) 100 100
Number seriation (N = 18) 100 100
Number comparisona (N = 20) 100 100
Number composition with token (N = 48) 100 100
Placing numbers on a line (N = 36) 75 100
Verbal numerical tasks
Counting (N = 70) 100 100
Dot enumeration (N = 20) 100 100
What comes
 next (N = 20) 100 100
 before (N = 20) 100 100
Bisection task
 Numbers (N = 10) 100 100
 Letters/Months/Days (N = 30) 100 100
Knowledge of number facts
 Personal (N = 10) 100 100
 Non-personal (N = 10) 100 100
 Knowledge of arithmetical signs (N = 8) 100 100
Transcoding
Reading
 one to four-digit (N = 100) 100  99.6 (0.5)
 five–digit (N = 10) 100  98.4 (2.1)
 six–digit (N = 10) 100  96 (1.8)
 number words (N = 50) 100 100
Writing
 one to four-digit (N = 50) 98  99.2 (0.7)
 five–digit (N = 10) 100  91.5 (8.7)
 six–digit (N = 10) 90  91.5 (7.4)
 number words (N = 20) 100 100
 6 → SIX (N = 20) 100 100
 SIX → 6 (N = 20) 100 100

Notes:

a

See also the patient's performance in a computerized version of the same task.