Table 3.

analysis of day 2 test. ANOVAs assessing noun vs. adjective targets (N.S. tests not included), early vs. late analysis windows (200-700 and 700-1200 msecs post-target onset), and cohort relevance (relevant = same form class as target) by item type (cohort vs. mean distractor proportions). Crucially, there are more looks to cohorts than distractors, and an interaction of item and relevance (the effect of target type was not significant, nor were any other interactions). Planned comparisons (below) reveal that the interaction stems from greater proportions for cohorts only in the relevant conditions.

Additional planned comparisons show this pattern holds for the early window.

	Full analysis
	Level A	Level B	F1(1, 11)	p	ω2	F2(1, 10)	p	ω2
	Early	Late
Window	.20	.17	21.7	.001	.462	11.5	.007	.535
	Relevant	Irrelevant
Relevance	.22	.17	17.0	.002	.400	7.9	.018	.441
	Cohort	Distractor
Item	.24	.17	7.3	.021	.210	5.7	.038	.362
Relevance × Item			5.8	.034	.342	8.8	.014	.468
	Planned comparisons
	Level A	Level B	F1(1, 11)	p	ω2	F2(1, 10)	p	ω2
	Cohort	Distractor
Item at Relevant	.26	.15	11.0	.007	.294	11.1	.008	.527
	Cohort	Distractor
Item at Irrelevant	.17	.16	< 1.0			1.2	.281	.072
	Cohort	Distractor
Item at Relevant, Early window only	.29	.16	10.3	.008	.279	7.7	.020	.434
	Cohort	Distractor
Item at Irrelevant, Early window only	.19	.17	< 1.0			< 1.0