Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct;20(8):582–590. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2008.04.019

Table 5.

Patients with one or more displacement of 5mm in weeks 1–2: univariate and multivariate logistic regression models

Category* Data
Univariate models
Multivariate models
Miss n 3 mm+ displacement OR (95% CI) z P n OR (95% CI) z P
T-stage 2 655 318 1.07 (0.85, 1.36) 0.59 0.558 645
Differentiation 0 657 320 0.81 (0.59, 1.12) −1.28 0.202
Age (quartile) 0 657 320 1.02 (0.88, 1.17) 0.23 0.819 0.98 (0.84, 1.14) −0.28 0.778
Risk group 0 657 320 0.98 (0.71, 1.36) −0.12 0.901 1.07 (0.75, 1.52) 0.37 0.708
Allocated treatment 0 657 320 0.83 (0.61, 1.12) −1.21 0.225 0.91 (0.66, 1.26) −0.57 0.566
Dose group 0 657 320 0.60 (0.17, 2.06) −0.82 0.414
Beam modification 6 651 319 1.72 (1.21, 2.45) 3.03 0.002 1.85 (1.09, 3.14) 2.29 0.022
Treatment verification 2 655 319 1.49 (1.08, 2.05) 2.43 0.015 2.69 (1.55, 4.68) 3.51 <0.001
Phase I fields 2 655 319 1.22 (0.89, 1.67) 1.24 0.214 1.16 (0.82, 1.63) 0.84 0.403
Fractions imaged 0 657 320 1.87 (1.45, 2.40) 4.88 <0.001 1.56 (1.38, 1.77) 6.92 <0.001
Baseline bladder symptoms 6 651 319 0.80 (0.58, 1.10) −1.40 0.161 0.78 (0.56, 1.10) −1.4 0.161

T-stage and differentiation were not included in the multivariate models because they were jointly represented in the risk group.

LMPA, low melting point alloy; MLC, multileaf collimator; EPI, electronic portal imaging.

Category (reference category is depicted in bold): T-stage = T1 vs T2 vs T3; Differentiation = Good vs moderate vs poor (based on differentiation or Gleason sum score, where available); Age = 46–62, 63–66, 67–70, 71 and over; Risk group = Low vs moderate (trial stratification factor); Allocated treatment = 74Gy/37 fractions vs 64 Gy/32 fractions; Beam modification = MLC vs LMPA; Treatment verification = EPI vs film; Phase I fields = three vs four; Total dose = <64Gy vs 64 Gy+; Number of fractions reported = 0–3 vs 4–6 vs 7+.