Table I.
CSS-Palm 2.0 | Threshold | Leave-one-out |
New data set |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ac (%) | Sn (%) | Sp (%) | MCC (%) | Ac (%) | Sn (%) | Sp (%) | MCC | ||
Before MaMa | High | 88.68 | 77.19 | 91.30 | 0.6495 | 89.00 | 56.60 | 93.82 | 0.5084 |
Medium | 82.38 | 82.89 | 82.26 | 0.5541 | 81.91 | 69.81 | 83.71 | 0.4256 | |
Low | 69.43 | 87.83 | 65.22 | 0.4153 | 71.88 | 75.47 | 71.35 | 0.3303 | |
After MaMb | High | 89.60 | 77.19 | 92.43 | 0.6709 | 89.49 | 56.60 | 94.38 | 0.5227 |
Medium | 85.92 | 82.89 | 86.61 | 0.6142 | 86.31 | 73.58 | 88.20 | 0.5207 | |
Low | 77.00 | 87.83 | 74.52 | 0.5024 | 76.28 | 81.13 | 75.56 | 0.4089 |
Both of the leave-one-out validation and the performance on the new data set were calculated and shown.
aPerformance before MaM.
bThe performance after MaM.