Skip to main content
. 2008 Jun 2;17(3):216–223. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023622

Table 2. Study characteristics.

Reference Population Method of record selection Method of review More than one adverse event per patient? Time frame of included events Kappa value for interobserver agreement Endpoints
1. Brennan et al25,32 Acute-care hospital patients (no psychiatric patients) Random sample of hospitalisations from 51 hospitals Two-stage record review: first, screening for one of 18 criteria by trained nurses; second, review by two physicians Not specified Occurred before and during and detected during index admission 0.61 Incidence, negligence, outcome, location, type of event
2. O’Neil et al23,28 Hospital patients All admissions to the medical service of one hospital over a 4-month period 1. Two-stage record review: first, screening for one of 15 criteria by medical-record analysts; second, review by physician No Not specified 0.57 Incidence, preventability
2. Reviewing reported incidents
3. Wilson et al3 Acute-care hospital patients (no psychiatric or day-care patients) Random sample of admissions from 28 hospitals Two-stage record review: first, screening for one of 18 criteria by trained nurses; second, review by two medical officers No Occurred before* and during and detected during or after index admission 0.55 Incidence, preventability, outcome, provider of care, location, type of event
4. Thomas et al2 Hospital patients (no psychiatric, rehabilitation or drug/alcohol treatment patients) Random sample of discharges from 28 hospitals Two-stage record review: first, screening for one of 15 criteria by trained nurses; second, review by physician No Occurred before and during and detected during index admission 0.4 Incidence, negligence, outcome, provider of care, location, type of event
5. Vincent et al26,33 Acute hospital patients (general medicine, general surgery, orthopaedic surgery, obstetrics) Records randomly drawn from two hospitals Two-stage record review: first, screening for one of 18 criteria by trained nurses; second, review by clinician Yes Not specified Not specified Incidence, preventability, outcome, provider of care, type of event
6. Davis et al24,30 Hospital patients (no psychiatric, day-care or rehabilitation patients) Random sample of admissions from 13 hospitals Two-stage record review: first, screening for one of 18 criteria by trained nurses; second, review by medical officer Not specified Occurred before* and during and detected during index admission 0.47 Incidence, preventability, outcome, provider of care, location, type of event
7. Baker et al31 Hospital patients (no paediatric, psychiatric, obstetric or rehabilitative) Random sample of admissions from 20 hospitals Two-stage record review: first, screening for one of 18 criteria by trained nurses; second, review by physician Yes Occurred before and during and detected during or after index admission† 0.47/0.45/0.69‡ Incidence, preventability, outcome, provider of care, type of event
8. Sari et al29 Hospital patients (surgery, general medicine, elderly care, orthopaedics, urology, oncology, ENT, ophthalmology) Random sample of admissions in one hospital 1. Two-stage record review: first, screening for one of 18 criteria by trained nurses; second, review by physician Yes Not specified 0.76 Incidence
2. Reviewing reported incidents

*Only included if (partly) responsible for index admission.

†Only included if occurred/was detected during a hospital admission.

‡Kappa values for interobserver agreement of judgement on injury/causation/preventability.