Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 16;2:79. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-2-79

Table 3.

Comparison of growth performance of the in silico strain iJN746 and KT2442.

Strain
 Carbon
source 		μmax(h-1)
iJN746 		μmax(h-1)
KT2442 		Carbon Uptake rate
(mmol gDW/h) 		O2 Uptake rate
(mmol gDW/h)
iJN746/KT2442 Glucose 0.751 0.56a 6.3a 15.34d
iJN746/KT2442 Toluene 0.421 0.72b 11.9b 18.5c
iJN746/KT2442 Toluene 0.476 0.72 11.9 20.93d
iJN746/KT2442 Toluene 0.7255 0.72 11.9 33
iJN746/KT2442 Toluene 1.262 0.72 11.9 ∞

Comparison of growth performance of the in silico strain iJN746 and KT2442. The in silico growth rate was calculated in iM9 minimal medium plus glucose or toluene. Due to candidate oxygen limited growth in toluene, the in silico growth rate was calculated under different oxygen uptake rates In addition iJN746 growth in toluene as only carbon source was simulated at different oxygen uptake rates. a from [25]; b from[26]; c from [78], and d experimentally determined in this study.