Table 1.
Payer |
Germany, Statutory Health Insurance |
England, National Health Service |
USA, Medicare |
USA, Blue Cross Blue Shield |
||
Trigger of coverage decisions | All hospital services are covered unless excluded explicitly. Evaluation upon request of entitled parties (no manufacturers) | All ambulatory services are excluded unless included explicitly. Evaluation upon request of entitled parties (no manufacturers) | Technologies with significant health benefits, social/political effects, impact on NHS resources and added value through guidance by NICE | Initiation of National Coverage Determination: Internally by CMS, external request by interested or aggrieved parties. Only services with considerable impact on the program are evaluated | Initiation of Local Coverage Determination: Internally by the contractor in case of need and in the absence of a NCD | Initiation on company-level, e.g. with Anthem internally by Medical Directors; externally by physicians, manufacturers, HTA organizations |
Deciding committee | G-BA, Commission for hospital services [27] | G-BA, Commission for ambulatory services [27] | Independent Appraisal Committee on behalf of NICE [28] | CMS [78] | Contractor's Medical Director [78] | Mostly committee or Medical Director |
Assessment | Review of evidence of medical benefit in patient-relevant endpoints [15,30,35,42]; HTA potentially by the Institute of Quality and Efficiency in Health Care | Cost-utility model based on all evidence available by contracted technology assessment team; threshold area about £20–30.000/QALY) [79] | Review of evidence of medical benefit; HTA potentially by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; by other HTA institution; or by Medicare Coverage Advisory Committee [8] | Review of evidence of medical benefit; HTA potentially by external institution [8] | Review of evidence of medical benefit; HTA potentially by Technology Evaluation Committee or other HTA institution [9] | |
Criteria for Appraisal | Expedience, necessity and efficiency | Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness | Reasonable and necessary | Reasonable and necessary | Medically necessary (Approval, evidence for net health benefits, as beneficial as established alternatives, attainable outside investigational settings) | |
Reimbursement | In-patient: DRGs | Out-patient: Fee for service | Global budgets for PCTs; DRGs paid by PCTs for hospital services | DRGs/Fee-for-service/budgets (MCOs) | ||
Management of service provision | e.g. quality assessment of doctors | e.g. requirement of participation in clinical trial | e.g. preauthorization | |||
Participation of company | Consideration of written comments | Comments about open issues, HTAs and provisional decision; submission of model, appeal possible | Defined periods for comments of all interested parties | Heterogeneous; contractors are required to permit participation | Heterogeneous; mainly participation of medical experts | |
Publication | Amongst others, current open issues, assessment reports and decisions are available through the internet | Process, assessment and appraisal available through the internet | Current open issues and decisions are available through the internet | Written communication in the jurisdiction of the contractor; also available through the internet | Heterogeneous; medical policies often available through the internet |
Abbreviations: CMS Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; DRG Diagnosis-Related Group; G-BA Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (Federal Joint Committee); HTA Health Technology Assessment; MCO Managed Care Organization; NICE National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence; PCT Primary Care Trust;