Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 27;205(11):2561–2574. doi: 10.1084/jem.20081212

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

CD4+ TEM cells constitutively express CD40L and promote DC maturation in vitro through CD40L–CD40 interaction. (a) Surface expression of CD40L (black lines) in CD4+ T naive (CD44lowCD62L+CD127+), TCM (CD44highCD62L+CD127+), and TEM (CD44highCD62LCD127+) cells. Gray lines represent control staining with isotype-matched control antibodies. (b) Kinetics of CD40L surface expression on CD4+ T cell subsets sorted as in panel a and stimulated in vitro with anti-CD3 and PdBU. Data are the means ± SD of three separate experiments. Student's t test on values at time 0: TEM versus TCM, P = 0.041; TEM versus T naive, P = 0.023; TCM versus T naive, NS. Unstimulated T cells cultured for the same time had a level of CD40L expression comparable to time 0 (not depicted). (c) Expression of CD40, CD86, and MHC class II (black lines) on DCs that had been cultured for 12 h with the indicated CD4+ T cell subsets or stimulated with LPS. Gray lines represent staining of untreated immature DCs. Results are representative of four independent experiments. (d) Expression of CD86 (black lines) in wild-type DCs (top) or CD40−/− DCs (bottom) cultured for 12 h with live or fixed CD4+ TEM cells or with LPS as control. Gray lines represent staining of untreated immature DCs. Results are representative of three independent experiments.