Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Aug 3;52(4):778–787. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.05.023

Table 5.

Circumstances for eGFR reporting, estimating equation used, and reporting convention, by laboratory strata

Circumstances for reporting** Equation used*** Reporting convention****
Stratum** All % (95% CI) When requested % (95% CI) Other % (95% CI) Total (n)* 4-variable MDRD % (95% CI) Other % (95% CI) Not sure % (95% CI) Total (n)* > 60 mL/min/1.732 % (95% CI) > 90 mL/min/1.732% (95% CI) Exact number % (95% CI) Don’t know % (95% CI) Total (n)*
Physician office 65.8 (57.6 – 74.0) 25.4 (17.9 – 33.0) 8.8 (3.9 – 13.7) 114 70.4 (62.6 – 78.3) 13.9 (7.9 – 19.9) 15.7 (9.4 – 21.9) 115 36.2 (27.9 – 44.4) 5.2 (1.4 – 9.0) 46.6 (38.0 – 55.1) 12.1 (6.5 – 17.7) 116
Hospital 68.8 (64.7 – 72.9) 21.7 (18.1 – 25.4) 9.4 (6.8 – 12.0) 414 76.2 (72.4 – 79.9) 14.3 (11.2 – 17.4) 9.5 (6.9 – 12.1) 420 49.2 (44.8 – 53.6) 5.3 (3.3 – 7.2) 37.4 (33.1 – 41.7) 8.2 (5.7 – 10.6) 417
Independent 50.6 (44.3 – 56.8) 45.5 (39.2 – 51.7) 4.0 (1.5 – 6.4) 176 72.9 (67.3 – 78.4) 11.9 (7.8 – 15.9) 15.3 (10.8 – 19.7) 177 46.0 (39.8 – 52.6) 8.0 (4.6 – 1.3) 35.8 (29.8 – 41.8) 10.2 (6.4 – 14.0) 176
Community Clinic 79.2 (73.5 – 85.0) 17.9 (12.4 – 23.4) 2.8 (0.5 – 5.2) 106 58.1 (51.1 – 65.1) 16.2 (11.0 – 21.4) 25.7 (19.5 – 31.9) 105 28.3 (21.9 – 34.7) 9.4 (5.3 – 13.6) 50.0 (42.9 – 57.1) 12.3 (7.6 – 16.9) 106
Health fair Insurance Public health 100.0 (100.0 – 100.0) 0 0 5 80.0 (54.3 – 100) 0 20.0 (0.0 – 45.7) 5 60.0 (28.5 – 91.5) 0 40.0 (8.6 – 71.5) 0.0 5
Other 69.1 (62.9 – 75.3) 21.6 (16.1 – 27.1) 9.3 (5.4 – 13.2) 162 58.3 (51.7 – 64.9) 16.6 (11.6 – 21.5) 25.1 (19.3 – 31.0) 163 47.5 (40.8 – 54.2) 3.1 (0.8 – 5.4) 31.5 (25.2 – 37.7) 17.9 (12.8 – 23.0) 162

Overall % ***** 66.7 (63.8 – 69.5) 25.0 (22.5 – 27.6) 8.3 (6.6 – 10.0) 977 71.6 (69.0 – 74.3) 14.3 (12.2 – 16.4) 14.1 (12.1 – 16.1) 985 45.3 (42.3 – 48.3) 5.5 (4.1 – 6.8) 38.7 (35.7 – 41.6) 10.5 (8.7 – 12.3) 982
*

Circumstances for reporting: 992 laboratories answered that they report eGFR. This table excludes 1 laboratory that skipped the question, 8 that answered “do not know,” and 6 that supplied answers that did not make sense; p < 0.001 for comparison over stratum. Pair-wise comparisons were calculated for reporting eGFR for all tests vs. when requested or other for the first 4 strata. P = 0.04 for independent comparison to physician office lab (POL), p < 0.001 for independent comparison to community clinic and to hospital. P = 0.5 for POL comparison to hospital, p = 0.08 for POL comparison to clinic, and p = 0.08 for hospital comparison to clinic.

**

Equation used: This table excludes 7 laboratories that skipped the question; p < 0.001 for comparison over stratum.

***

Reporting convention: This table excludes 10 laboratories that skipped the question; p = 0.001 for comparison over stratum. Pair-wise comparisons were calculated for >60 vs. exact for the first 4 strata. P = 0.004 for clinic comparison to hospital, p = 0.02 for clinic comparison to independent, p = 0.09 for POL comparison to hospital, p = 0.2 for POL comparison to independent, p = 0.6 for POL comparison to clinic, and p = 0.9 for hospital comparison to independent.

****

Weighted percentage.