Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Emerg Med. 2007 Oct 25;35(3):329–335. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.02.065

Table 3.

Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals from Subgroup Analyses by Race of Logistical Regressions Predicting Abuse Category

Models Completed Attempted
Sub-Group Analyses by Race OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
African American n=92 n=108
  Strangulation 4.65 2.18–9.95 3.72 1.81–7.65
  Age 1.04 1.00–1.08 1.04 1.00–1.08
  Relationship status (referent broken up) 1.74 0.86–3.49 0.62 0.31–1.26
  Employment (referent unemployed) 1.09 0.53–2.24 0.72 0.36–1.43
  Education (referent no high school) .26 0.11–0.62 0.34 0.14–0.79
  Relationship length (referent < 12 months) 1.08 0.48–2.42 1.44 0.65–3.22
White n=53 n=38
  Strangulation 13.72 5.40–34.84 14.22 4.67–43.30
  Age 1.06 1.02–1.09 1.1 1.04–1.16
  Relationship status 0.40 0.15–1.01 0.16 0.05–0.48
  Employment status 0.22 0.08–0.61 0.11 0.04–0.30
  Education 0.55 0.17–1.72 0.26 0.08–0.85
  Relationship length (referent < 12 months) 0.99 0.41–2.41 0.90 0.32–2.60
Latina n=50 n=33
  Strangulation (referent no strangulation) 21.16 5.8–77.8 16.30 3.7–72.1
  Age 1.07 1.01–1.13 1.11 1.03–1.18
  Relationship status (referent broken up) 0.18 0.07–.48 0.30 0.11–0.84
  Employment (referent unemployed) 1.80 0.62–5.07 0.90 0.31–2.59
  Education (referent : no high school) 0.78 0.30–2.04 0.91 0.32–2.61
  Relationship length (referent < 12 months) 3.73 0.98–14.3 0.54 0.17–1.76