Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Linear Algebra Appl. 2008 Mar 1;428(5-6):1345–1364. doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2007.07.026

Table 1.

Summary metrics for resulting dose distributions on all ten plans after prioritized optimization using the same slip parameters. Units are Gy except for V40 (in % volume). Performance metrics tend to be very similar, with the exception of plan 2, which appeared to be a lower quality solution (perhaps due to lack of solution optimality).

Plan D95 to PTV Min dose to PTV Standard deviation of PTV dose Max dose to normal tissues* Max dose to outer normal tissues** MOH84 to rectum V40 to rectum (in %) Mean dose to bladder
1 67.7 67.6 0.90 68.6 44.1 42.6 44.4 48.6
2 67.7 67.4 0.94 73.2 51.1 54.6 67.4 52.7
3 66.5 65.5 1.38 67.6 55.3 33.5 29.6 26.5
4 67.7 67.5 0.96 69.1 53.1 48.2 52.1 53.3
5 67.8 67.5 0.88 68.7 57.8 30.3 31.0 25.0
6 67.8 67.3 0.92 71.2 59.4 26.9 27.7 25.8
7 67.8 67.7 0.98 68.6 52.7 43.0 45.0 42.3
8 67.8 67.7 0.89 70.3 57.7 46.6 51.3 11.8
9 66.6 65.7 1.30 66.5 54.7 43.6 43.6 39.5
10 67.7 67.2 0.93 69.3 55.0 38.1 35.0 39.0
*

outside of a 0.5 cm range around target

**

outside of a 3.0 cm range around target