Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jun 20;40(5):1661–1666. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.05.007

Table 2.

Intercorrelations Among all Variables (N=316)

Variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1) TFS
2) CFC .23**
3) AB −.25** −.14*
4) RD −.12* −.15** .50**
5) DAS −.12* .02 .41** .28**
6) DAX-PA −.25** −.24** .59** .33** .23**
7) DAX-UV −.25** −.21** .62** .50** .40** .66**
8) DAX-AC −.13* .21** −.08 −.12* −.12* .04 −.03
9) DAX-VA −.27** −.08 .65** .35** .44** .44** .58** −.04
*

p < .05.

**

p < .01

Note. TFS = Trait Forgiveness Scale; CFC = Consideration of Future Consequences; AB = Aggressive Behavior; RD = Risky Driving; DAS = Driving Anger Scale; DAX-PA = Physically Aggressive Expression; DAX-UV = Use of the Vehicle to Express Anger; DAX-AC = Adaptive/Constructive Expression; DAX-VA = Verbally Aggressive Expression.