Table 3.
Testing the hypothesis that rates of different –types of responses in Experiment 5 differ from chance (25%). Note that italicized conditions are significantly below chance.
| Mean | DP | t-Value | P-Value | 95% Lower | 95% Upper | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VISback2 | .171 | 9 | −2.847 | .0192 | .108 | .234 |
| VIS back 4 | .215 | 9 | −1.282 | .2318 | .153 | .277 |
| VIS back | .227 | 9 | −.842 | .4218 | .165 | .289 |
| VIS Back 12 | .211 | 9 | −1.562 | .1527 | .155 | .267 |
| MEMback2 | .565 | 9 | 6.634 | <.0001 | .457 | .672 |
| MEM back4 | .325 | 9 | 3.197 | .0109 | .272 | .379 |
| MEM back8 | .268 | 9 | 1.137 | .2847 | .232 | .304 |
| MEM back12 | .241 | 9 | −.795 | .4470 | .216 | .266 |
| WRONG back2 /2 | .133 | 9 | −7.382 | <.0001 | .097 | .169 |
| WRONG back4 / 2 | .231 | 9 | −1.606 | .1426 | .204 | .258 |
| WRONG back8 / 2 | .254 | 9 | .305 | .7673 | .228 | .279 |
| WRONG back 12 / 2 | .274 | 9 | 1.888 | .0916 | .245 | .303 |
| Unattended | .301 | 9 | 1.809 | .1039 | .237 | .364 |