Skip to main content
. 2008 May 23;168(2):188–196. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn103

TABLE 2.

Factors associated with vaginal douching and loss to follow-up, Longitudinal Study of Vaginal Flora (n = 3,620), Birmingham, Alabama, 1999–2003

Model A: douching at study entry* Model B: douching at follow-up visits Model C: censoring
aOR§ 95% CI§ aOR 95% CI aOR 95% CI
Demographic factors
    Age (years)
        15–25 Referent
        26–35 1.37 1.15, 1.64 1.24 1.08, 1.43 1.58 1.38, 1.82
        36–46 1.57 1.21, 2.04 1.21 1.00, 1.46 2.12 1.72, 2.61
    Race/ethnicity
        Non-Black Referent
        Black 1.76 1.46, 2.13 1.36 1.15, 1.62 1.49 1.29, 1.72
    Education completed (years)
        ≤12 Referent
        >12 0.72 0.61, 0.86 0.69 0.60, 0.80 1.10 0.96, 1.26
Time-dependent factors
    Vaginal douching 30.67 26.12, 36.01 0.89 0.80, 1.00
    Alcohol drinking
        Never Referent
        Monthly or less 1.17 0.98, 1.38 1.21 1.04, 1.41 1.23 1.08, 1.40
        Several times per month or more 1.59 1.33, 1.90 1.19 1.03, 1.38 1.21 1.06, 1.38
    Cigarette smoking 1.67 1.41, 1.97 1.16 1.00, 1.33 0.79 0.70, 0.89
    Use of oral contraceptives 0.96 0.81, 1.16 1.04 0.89, 1.22 1.15 1.00, 1.33
    Tubal ligation 1.46 1.16, 1.82 1.42 1.19, 1.69 1.45 1.21, 1.75
    Use of depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate 1.13 0.91, 1.40 0.89 0.74, 1.08 1.40 1.21, 1.62
    Regularity of menstrual cycle
        Regular, could predict within 1 week Referent
        Not regular, hard to predict 0.97 0.81, 1.16 1.05 0.88, 1.25
        Absent 0.55 0.42, 0.71 1.28 1.04, 1.58
    Days since last menstrual period
        0–10 Referent
        11–20 1.00 0.83, 1.20 1.02 0.89, 1.18 0.95 0.83, 1.10
        21–30 1.21 0.99, 1.48 0.97 0.82, 1.14 0.95 0.82, 1.11
        31–40 1.18 0.83, 1.67 1.03 0.75, 1.41 0.77 0.61, 0.97
        ≥41 1.04 0.76, 1.42 0.62 0.48, 0.79 0.60 0.50, 0.73
    No. of recent sexual partners
        0 Referent
        1 1.62 1.29, 2.03 0.87 0.74, 1.03 0.91 0.78, 1.07
        ≥2 1.75 1.31, 2.35 0.83 0.63, 1.08 1.01 0.80, 1.29
    Consistency of condom use
        Never Referent
        Sometimes 1.18 0.99, 1.42 1.03 0.87, 1.23 1.19 1.02, 1.39
        Always 1.04 0.86, 1.26 1.02 0.86, 1.21 1.08 0.93, 1.25
    Rectal sex 1.14 0.82, 1.58 0.99 0.72, 1.37 1.42 1.04, 1.93
    Use of insertive sex toy 1.18 0.87, 1.60 1.23 0.91, 1.65 1.01 0.75, 1.34
    Self-reported vaginal symptoms
        Malodor 0.81 0.68, 0.97 1.19 1.03, 1.39
        Discharge 0.95 0.82, 1.10 0.85 0.75, 0.96
        Irritation 0.76 0.59, 0.96 1.06 0.86, 1.31
        Itching 1.00 0.78, 1.27 0.91 0.75, 1.11
    Use of over-the-counter antifungal medication or terazol 0.83 0.64, 1.07 1.04 0.82, 1.32
    Metronidazole or clindamycin 1.11 0.92, 1.34 0.96 0.82, 1.12
    Vaginal Gram stain score
        0–3 (normal flora) Referent
        4–6 (intermediate flora) 1.14 0.97, 1.33 0.95 0.82, 1.10
        7–10 (bacterial vaginosis flora) 1.21 1.05, 1.40 0.90 0.80, 1.03
    Sexually transmitted infection
        Gonorrhea 0.78 0.57, 1.07
        Chlamydia 1.10 0.93, 1.32
        Trichomonas 0.96 0.76, 1.21 0.70 0.59, 0.84
*

A logistic regression model for the probability of douching at baseline given factors reported for the 6 months prior to baseline (t = 1).

A pooled logistic regression model for douching at t (t > 1) given factors at t − 1, including douching status, and genital tract infections.

A pooled discrete logistic regression hazard model for attending study visit t (t > 1) given factors reported for the 3 months prior to time t, douching status at t − 1, and genital tract infections measured at time t − 1.

§

aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Number of sex partners in the most recent study interval.