Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Mar 6;17(3):614–620. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0761

Table 2.

Hormone concentrations in case-control pairs

Hormone Cases (n = 153)
Controls (n = 153)
Paired t test (P) HR (95% CI) P
Mean (SD) Median (interquartile range) Mean (SD) pairwise difference
Estradiol (pg/mL) 22.7 (56.0) 8.2 (5.8−13.3) −11.8 (51.2) 0.05 1.41 (1.01−1.97) 0.04
Bioavailable estradiol (pg/mL) 12.5 (29.8) 4.64 (2.8−9.1) −6.4 (26.8) 0.02 1.26 (1.03−1.53) 0.02
Free estradiol (pg/mL) 0.47 (1.12) 0.17 (0.11−0.34) −0.24 (1.01) 0.02 1.31 (1.03−1.65) 0.03
Testosterone (ng/dL) 30.6 (18.7) 25.8 (19.5−36.7) −1.8 (24.4) 0.99 1.15 (0.75−1.74) 0.52
Bioavailable testosterone (ng/dL) 12.4 (8.8) 10.7 (7.5−13.7) −1.7 (10.6) 0.52 1.21 (0.82−1.80) 0.33
Free testosterone (pg/mL) 4.8 (3.4) 4.2 (2.9−5.3) −0.7 (4.1) 0.53 1.21 (0.82−1.80) 0.33
SHBG (nmol/L) 75.0 (40.7) 68.0 (46.5−93.5) +5.6 (58.7) 0.24 0.86 (0.56−1.33) 0.51

NOTE: Values shown are mean (SD) and median (interquartile range) for recurred women (cases), median (SD) difference in controls, significance level for paired t tests, HR (95% CI), and significance level for a Cox model of time to event adjusted for tumor grade (153 pairs) in the nested case-control cohort of the WHEL Study.

Paired t tests and Cox models were conducted using log-transformed pairwise data. HRs reflect risk per unit increase in log of hormone concentration.