Table 2.
Correlations among Predictors, Behavioral Intentions, and Implementation Intentionsa
Behavioral intentions | Thought about where | Thought about appointment | Pros | Cons | Subjective norms | Perceived control | Age | Previous mammograpy maintenance | Barriers | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Behavioral intentions | — | 0.06** | 0.10*** | −0.03 | −0.01 | 0.05* | 0.12*** | 0.14*** | 0.20*** | −0.15*** |
Thought about where | 0.08*** | 0.00 | −0.02 | −0.02 | 0.05* | −0.02 | 0.06** | 0.00 | ||
Thought about appointment | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | −0.03 | 0.01 | 0.14*** | −0.08*** | |||
Pros | 0.34*** | −0.30*** | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | ||||
Cons | −0.19*** | −0.04 | −0.02 | −0.01 | 0.03 | |||||
Subjective norms | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | −0.04 | ||||||
Perceived control | 0.09*** | 0.05* | −0.12*** | |||||||
Age | 0.23*** | −0.13*** | ||||||||
Previous mammography maintenance | −0.28*** | |||||||||
Barriers | — |
Correlations reported are bivariate, point biserial correlations.
*p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001.