Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep;17(7):1133–1141. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0600

Table 3.

Relationship Between Predictors and Intentions: OR (95% CI)a

Predictors Behavioral intentions Thought about where Thought about appointment
Pros 0.94 (0.47–1.91) 1.11 (0.55–2.27) 1.14 (0.79–1.65)
Cons 1.13 (0.10–12.36) 0.29 (0.03–2.96) 1.90 (0.55–6.52)
Subjective norms 1.51 (0.96–2.39) 0.70 (0.41–1.22) 1.14 (0.87–1.50)
Perceived control 2.07 (1.42–3.01)*** 1.57 (1.05–2.35)* 0.81 (0.64–1.02)
Age 1.05 (1.02–1.09)** 0.98 (0.95–1.01) 0.99 (0.98–1.01)
Previous mammography maintenance 5.21 (3.23–8.40)*** 1.78 (1.23–2.59)** 1.73 (1.42–2.10)***
Barriers
 0 vs. 1 0.59 (0.28–1.24) 1.88 (1.14–3.12)* 0.91 (0.71–1.16)
 0 vs. 2 0.26 (0.14–0.50)*** 1.29 (0.85–1.96) 0.79 (0.63–0.99)*
a

All models satisfied the proportional odds assumption (p > 0.05) and were significant overall (p < 0.001).

*p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001.