Table 2.
Comparison of alignment tensor and sedimentation velocity parameters for tSH2 and tSH2pm
| Protein | Domain | α*, ° | β*, ° | γ*, ° | Aa† | R† | Rdip‡ | n§ | s20,w | f/f0¶ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tSH2 | N-SH2 | 80 | 65 | 140 | −0.00166 | 0.39 | 0.37 | 29 | 2.61 | 1.28 |
| C-SH2 | 75 | 82 | 131 | −0.00161 | 0.59 | 0.29 | 26 | |||
| tSH2pm | N-SH2 | 92 | 49 | 133 | 0.00120 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 48 | 2.28 | 1.46 |
| C-SH2 | 6 | 31 | 15 | −0.000884 | 0.44 | 0.28 | 50 |
Alignment was estimated from RDCs of the N-SH2 and C-SH2 domains independently using the program RDCA (22).
*α, β, and γ are Euler angles for the conversion of the alignment tensor frame into the molecular frame.
†Aa and R are the unitless axial and rhombic components of the alignment tensor.
‡Rdip=
, the quality factor that describes the fit of observed RDCs (Dmeas) to RDCs calculated from crystal structure (Dcalc).
§Number of RDC values in the fit.
¶Friction ratio estimated from s20,w/sma