Table 2.
Demonstration of Simpson's paradox in the pooling of data from three observational studies, showing the value of meta-analysis
| Mortality | ||||
| Treatment | Placebo | Risk ratioa | Significance | |
| Study 1 | 97/492 = 19.7% | 202/802 = 24.8% | 0.794 | 0.03 |
| Study 2 | 590/795 = 74.2% | 410/510 = 80.4% | 0.924 | 0.01 |
| Study 3 | 300/610 = 49.2% | 286/490 = 58.4% | 0.843 | 0.002 |
| Pooled data | 987/1,897 = 52.0% | 898/1,812 = 49.6% | 1.050 | 0.13 |
Meta-analysis of the above data (using [40]), fixed-effects model: Q statistic = 3.398, P = 0.18; combined risk ratio = 0.898, P = 0.0001.
aTreatment/placebo.