Table I.
Criterion | MedDRA (ratings in grey borrowed from Bousquet et al.) [22] | SNOMED CT | CTCAE, v.3 |
---|---|---|---|
Selected Terminology Desiderata[19] | |||
Vocabulary content – comprehensive for AE domain; should include signs, symptoms, lab values, diseases and disorders. | E | E | F |
Concept orientation | E | E | F |
Concept orientation | E | E | E |
Concept permanence | E | E | E |
Non-semantic concept identifiers | E | E | E |
Polyhierarchy | P | E | N/A |
Formal definitions | N | E | N |
Rejection of ‘not elsewhere classified terms’ | N | N | N |
Multiple granularities | F | E | N/A |
Multiple consistent views | P | E | N |
Context representation | P | F | P |
Graceful evolution | E | E | E |
Recognized redundancy | N | F/P | N |
Coding system type | terminology | terminology | classification |
Post-coordination | no | yes | N/A |
Incorporated in UMLS | yes | yes | yes |
Designed specifically for representing AEs | yes | no | yes |
Scope | AEs, PE findings, Medical History | Clinical findings | Toxicities |
Global acceptance for AE reporting (i.e., ICH) | yes | no | no |
FDA acceptance | yes | Yes for SPL; no for AE | no |
Mappings to other possible standards | yes | yes | some |
Free or low-cost use – US Users | no | yes | yes |
Free or low-cost use – International Users | no | some | yes |
Already in-use for Pharmaceutical Companies | yes | no | some |
“Human readable” concept definitions | no | no | yes |
Established rules for assigning codes | yes | some | yes |
Training & Guidance Resources exist | E | P | E |
Training & Guidance Resources are affordable/accessible | fee | fee | free |
Previous/Demonstrated Organizational Experience in Adverse Events | yes | no | yes |
Explicit Severity Grading | no | no | yes |
E=Excellent, F=Fair, P=Poor, N=None; N/A = Not applicable