Skip to main content
. 2008 May 8;105(4):1352–1358. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90423.2008

Table 3.

Meta-analysis results for DBP stratified by PPARGC1A Gly482Ser genotypes

Cohort DBP, mmHg
ANOVA, P Value
Genotype Frequencies
Gly/Gly Gly/Ser Ser/Ser Significance of Interaction
Gly/Gly Gly/Ser Ser/Ser Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI Gene-Sex Gene-Age Gene-BMI
Danish whites
    Study 1 (Ref. 8)* 454 442 117 84.4 83.4–85.4 84.1 83.1–85.1 83.0 81.1–84.9 0.467 0.575 0.759 0.359
    Study 3 (Ref. 8)* 63 69 25 78.7 75.9–81.5 76.8 74.1–79.5 77.4 73.0–81.8 0.601 0.053 0.659 0.776
    Study 4 (Ref. 8)* 281 316 101 95.3 93.7–96.9 95.7 94.2–97.2 92.7 90.0–95.4 0.159 0.613 0.711 0.279
    Study 5 (Ref. 8)* 212 195 65 76.7 75.4–78 75.7 74.4–77.0 78.7 76.4–81.0 0.080 0.463 0.971 0.467
Pima Indians 735 318 35 67.9 67.1–68.7 68.5 67.2–69.8 70.5 66.6–74.4 0.363 0.924 0.593 0.504
UK whites
    MRC Ely 233 306 73 77.0 75.7–78.3 75.9 74.8–77.0 73.2 70.9–75.5 0.018 0.251 0.532 0.397
    CCCS cases 175 176 43 86.3 84.8–87.8 85.1 83.6–86.6 85.8 82.7–88.9 0.541 0.236 0.214 0.327
    CCCS controls 194 197 75 83.9 82.4–85.4 84.6 83.0–86.2 87.0 84.5–89.5 0.131 0.113 0.266 0.593
French Canadians (Ref. 2) 64 73 19 84.6 82.1–87.1 87.5 85.2–89.8 89.0 84.4–93.6 0.137 0.085 0.4 0.19
EPIC
    Obese 364 339 96 86.3 85.2–87.4 86.1 85.0–87.2 86.0 83.9–88.1 0.973 0.051 0.188 0.854
    Cohort 762 789 201 81.9 81.2–82.6 82.0 81.3–82.7 82.5 81.1–83.9 0.805 0.878 0.59 0.858
Danish whites (Ref. 4) 931 1,036 288 81.8 81.1–82.5 82.3 81.7–82.9 82.0 80.7–83.3 0.39
Asian Indians
    Controls (Ref. 3) 534 360 81 76.0 75.2–76.8 75.0 74.0–76.0 75.0 72.8–77.2 0.6
    Cases (Ref. 3) 303 212 52 79.0 77.8–80.2 77.0 75.5–78.5 75.0 72.3–77.7 0.007
Slovenian whites
    Cases (Ref. 5) 114 118 29 84.7 83–86.4 85.7 83.8–87.6 85.0 82.5–87.5 0.74
    Controls (Ref. 5) 14 15 1 83.8 78.1–89.5 84.8 78.5–91.1 84.0 0.7
Overall 5,433 4,961 1,301 80.3 80–80.6 81.5 81.2–81.8 82.1 81.5–82.7 0.651§ 0.715 0.00004 0.953
Standard error 0.005§
Cohort heterogeneity P 0.021§
Ethnicity heterogeneity P 0.414§
Caucasian only
    Overall 3,861 4,071 1,133 83.4 83.0–83.7 83.3 83.0–83.7 83.3 82.7–83.9 0.659§ 0.700 0.789 0.348
    Heterogeneity P 0.109§
*

Studies 1, 3, 4, and 5 correspond to the study numbers mentioned in the paper.

Studies with raw data. The main effect and interaction analyses are adjusted for age and sex.

Studies from published paper. Mean, SD, and ANOVA P values were obtained from published papers or from authors.

§

Based on 10,000 simulations. A random-effect generalized linear model is applied if P < 0.05 for heterogeneity; otherwise, a fixed model is applied.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure