Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 30;295(4):R1066–R1076. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.90309.2008

Table 1.

Selected characteristics of the experimental diets

Diet
Preference Ratio, %
Energy Density, kcal/g Macronutrient Composition, kcal %
Harlan LM-485 (Regular Chow) 5TUM Diet (Chow A/I) 5TUL Chocolate Diet (Preferred) Carbohydrate Protein Fat
Harlan LM-485 (Regular Chow)* 13.9±7.0 9.3±3.6 3.41 66.0 21.0 13.0
5TUM Diet (Chow A/I) 86.1±7.0 8.8±3.7 3.30 65.5 24.1 10.4
5TUL Chocolate Diet (Preferred) 90.7±3.6 91.2±3.7 3.48 66.8 20.5 12.7

Preferences are expressed as means ± SE and were calculated as the % of total intake (kcal) by acclimated male Wistar rats (n = 6/preference test) in two-choice 24-h preference tests where preference ratio = 100 × Row/(Row + Column) of intakes. (row vs. column). Diet specifications are available in Supplemental Table 1 and as follows: Harlan LM-485 (Regular Chow; http://www.teklad.com/standardrodentdiet/r7012.asp), 5TUM Diet (Chow A/I; http://www.testdiet.com/PDF/5TUM.pdf), and 5TUL Chocolate Diet (Preferred; http://www.testdiet.com/PDF/5TUL.pdf).

*

Harlan Teklad, Indianapolis, IN.

TestDiet, Richmond, IN.

P < 0.001.