Table 1.
Diet |
Preference Ratio, % |
Energy Density, kcal/g | Macronutrient Composition, kcal %
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harlan LM-485 (Regular Chow) | 5TUM Diet (Chow A/I) | 5TUL Chocolate Diet (Preferred) | Carbohydrate | Protein | Fat | ||
Harlan LM-485 (Regular Chow)* | 13.9±7.0‡ | 9.3±3.6‡ | 3.41 | 66.0 | 21.0 | 13.0 | |
5TUM Diet (Chow A/I)† | 86.1±7.0‡ | 8.8±3.7‡ | 3.30 | 65.5 | 24.1 | 10.4 | |
5TUL Chocolate Diet (Preferred)† | 90.7±3.6‡ | 91.2±3.7‡ | 3.48 | 66.8 | 20.5 | 12.7 |
Preferences are expressed as means ± SE and were calculated as the % of total intake (kcal) by acclimated male Wistar rats (n = 6/preference test) in two-choice 24-h preference tests where preference ratio = 100 × Row/(Row + Column) of intakes. (row vs. column). Diet specifications are available in Supplemental Table 1 and as follows: Harlan LM-485 (Regular Chow; http://www.teklad.com/standardrodentdiet/r7012.asp), 5TUM Diet (Chow A/I; http://www.testdiet.com/PDF/5TUM.pdf), and 5TUL Chocolate Diet (Preferred; http://www.testdiet.com/PDF/5TUL.pdf).
Harlan Teklad, Indianapolis, IN.
TestDiet, Richmond, IN.
P < 0.001.