TABLE 2.
Docked-not-Tethered | Docked-and-Tethered | Tethered | Outlier | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Experimental vesicle counts | 81 ± 37 | 43 ± 8 | 357 ± 42 | 1,997 ± 320 |
Simulated vesicle counts | 91 ± 31 | 39 ± 11 | 361 ± 38 | 1,914 ± 615 |
Colocalized with channels | 9 ± 6 | 19 ± 7 | 0 | 0 |
Simulated exocytosis | ||||
Vesicles | 9.3 ± 6.4 | 19.8 ± 6.9 | 1.3 ± 1.4 | 0.1 ± 0.4 |
% of population | 10 ± 7 | 52 ± 18 | 0.39 ± 0.46 | 0.01 ± 0.02 |
% of colocalized | 98 ± 5 | 98 ± 3 |
All values are means ± SD of 250 trials, except experimental vesicle count variations, which are SE. Experimental vesicle counts from Lenzi et al. (2002), where they used the nomenclature: Outlying, docked; Synaptic body associated, docked; Synaptic body associated, not docked; Outlying, not docked. We modified their anatomical nomenclature in an effort to better reflect each group's functional significance in our active-zone simulations, specifically contrasting the two groups that dominate exocytosis: docked-not-tethered versus docked-and-tethered vesicles. Colocalized vesicles were 5–8 nm from the nearest calcium channel (see methods). Simulated exocytosis was driven by 10 ms of maximal calcium influx. Percentage exocytosis computed on a trial-by-trial basis then averaged across trials.