Table 4.
Analysis of Env-mediated fusogenicitya.
| Log10 [Ymax] (95% confidence limit) | Time to reach 1.0E+4 RLU/secb | Time to reach 1.0E+5 RLU/secb | Difference | |
| Br | 5.94 (5.76–6.12) | 99 | 163 | 64 |
| Spl | 5.43 (5.01–5.85) | 161 | 307 | 146 |
| BS | 5.83 (5.65–6.01) | 106 | 178 | 72 |
| SB | 5.59 (5.49–5.70) | 175 | 312 | 137 |
| Br(N283T) | 5.93 (5.74–6.12) | 104 | 171 | 67 |
| Spl(T283N) | 5.50 (5.12–5.88) | 175 | 323 | 148 |
| Bv1v3 | 5.93 (5.71–6.14) | 109 | 180 | 71 |
| Bv1v2 | 5.62 (5.43–5.81) | 137 | 243 | 106 |
| DS17 | 5.65 (5.44–5.86) | 125 | 220 | 95 |
| DS17(N283T) | 5.61 (5.32–5.89) | 121 | 215 | 94 |
| BaL | 5.70 (5.51–5.89) | 122 | 211 | 89 |
aNon-linear regression analysis was performed using an exponential model (Ymax, estimated maximal response in RLU/second) with background-subtracted data comprising 60–420 minutes after initiation of co-culture.
bEstimated time is expressed in minutes.