Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 10;46(11):3813–3816. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01169-08

TABLE 1.

Comparison of incubation and turnaround times for the manual and automated detection protocols

Protocol (no. of tests) Step Time (min)a Incubation temp (°C)
Manual (24) Hybridization 30 53
Ambient wash 1
Stringent wash 15 53
Conjugate 30
Ambient wash 1
Ambient wash 10
Ambient wash 10
Ambient wash 5
Citrate 5
Substrate 10
Distilled water 5
Distilled water 5
Distilled water 0
Incubation time 127
Turnaround timeb 180 (approx)
BeeBlot (48)c Preheat 15d 51.5
Hybridization 30 51.5
Ambient wash 0
Conjugate 15
Stringent wash 12 51.5
Ambient wash aspirate 0
Ambient wash dispense 5
Ambient wash 5
Citrate 5
Substrate 10
Distilled water 0
Distilled water 0
Distilled water 0
Incubation time 97
Turnaround time 150 (approx)
a

Buffer preparation and strip labeling times are similar for both methods.

b

Turnaround time includes additional hands-on and/or instrument processing times.

c

Times and incubation temperatures as entered into the BeeBlot instrument.

d

Strips can be labeled during the preheat incubation.