Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 1;36(19):6209–6217. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn589

Table 2.

Calculated changes in binding energies of DNA and amino acid point mutations compared with experiments (15,30)

DNA Sequence ΔE binding ΔG binding (experiment)
Binding to wild-type PurR
    seqc 0 0.0
    seq3 0.16 0.8
    seq1 2.02 1.6
    seq2 6.78 3.2
Binding to the K55A mutant
    seq1 −7.53 −0.06
    seq2 −4.47 −0.46
    seqc 0 0
    seq3 1.13 0.5

Mutant ΔE binding ΔG binding (experiment)

PurR mutants bound to the consensus sequence
    WT 0 0
    L54M 5.79 0.38
    L54S 16 larger, not measured
    L54T 10.05 ,,
    L54V 6.15 ,,
    K55A 12.55 3.48

When only the DNA is mutated, the binding order is correct (top panel). When both DNA and the protein are mutated (middle panel), two DNA mutants are lower in binding energy and one higher than the original sequence. This is correctly identified by our method, but the binding preference to seq1 and seq2 is reversed. When only the protein is mutated, the binding preferences of the DNA to the mutants are correctly captured (bottom panel). Energies are given in kilo calories per mole and measured relative to the respective consensus protein–DNA complex.