Table 3.

Correlation between characteristics of work organisation and WIF: bivariate analysis (hierarchy according to eta; +/- indicating positive/negative correlation)

characteristics of work organisation		F	p	eta	eta2
number of days gone to work despite own illness	+	16.296	< .001	.386	.146
planned vacations postponed (frequency)	+	13.074	< .001	.291	.085
staff shortage as presumed reasons for changes in duty roster	+	23.098	< .001	.270	.073
strain due to a lost weekend off	+	10.413	< .001	.264	.070
strain due to changes in duty roster ignoring personal requests	+	9.335	< .001	.252	.063
colleagues on vacation as presumed reasons for changes in duty roster	+	14.230	< .001	.215	.046
exemption from duty during training	+	7.688	.001	.225	.051
personal requests ignored at changes in duty roster (frequency)	+	7.374	.001	.221	.049
strain due to being called on duty out of a day off	+	7.063	.001	.221	.049
strain due to having to continue to work after shift	+	6.144	.002	.205	.042
competitive pressure in department	+	4.072	.003	.232	.054
colleagues on maternity/parental leave as presumed reasons for changes in duty roster	+	8.776	.003	.171	.029
general frequency changes in duty roster on short notice	+	4.754	.003	.218	.047
appreciation of work by superiors	-	3.502	.008	.216	.047
continue working after shift (frequency)	+	3.922	.021	.164	.027