Table 5.
Factors Associated in Logistic Regression With Having Had an HIV Test During Pregnancy, 2005: the Brownsville-Matamoros Sister City Project for Women's Health
| Variable | OR (95% CI) | P value |
|---|---|---|
| Place of residencea | ||
| Matamoros | 1.00 | |
| Cameron County | 11.65 (6.65-20.42) | <.001 |
| Age, y | ||
| 14-19 | 1.00 | |
| 20-24 | 0.75 (0.44-1.27) | .28 |
| 25-34 | 1.35 (0.86-2.12) | .19 |
| 35-43 | 2.74 (1.44-5.22) | .003 |
| Tested for HIV before pregnancy | ||
| Yes | 4.76 (3.32-7.00) | <.001 |
| No | 1.00 | |
| Discussed HIV testing with health care professional during prenatal care | ||
| Yes | 5.52 (3.89-7.82) | <.001 |
| No | 1.00 | |
| Knowledge of HIV infection prevention methodsb | ||
| Mentioned either condom use or monogamy with an uninfected partner | 1.82 (1.00-3.31) | .05 |
| Mentioned both methods | 2.83 (1.46-5.47) | .002 |
| Did not mention either method | 1.00 | |
Abbreviations: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
a
Women who reported living in both the United States and Mexico or did not respond to this item were coded as living in the country where they delivered.
b
The original item was open-ended. Only those methods described in the Compendium of Indicators for Evaluating Reproductive Health Programs are reported here.