Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 May 21;97(1-2):130–138. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.018

Table 3.

Concurrent validity of VASE-R scale and components

Full VASE-R scale Reflective listening subscale Responding to resistance subscale Summarizing subscale Eliciting change talk subscale Developing discrepancy subscale
HRQ .50*** .45*** .38*** .41*** .36*** .23**
SP interview empathy .44*** .42*** .40*** .19* .32*** .24**
SP interview MI spirit .32*** .29** .31*** .15 .24** .13
SP interview R:Q .35*** .33*** .25** .22* .31** .18*
SP interview %OQ .16 .14 .08 .12 .32*** −.04
SP interview %CR .11 .08 .10 .02 .12 .10
SP interview %MIA .26* .30** .31** .15 .10 .01

Notes: N = 144 substance abuse treatment practitioners prior to MI training. All values are Pearson product-moment correlations. HRQ reflects summary score for Helpful Responses Questionnaire (Miller et al., 1991). SP interview reflects a 20-min audio-recorded encounter later reviewed and scored using the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity scale (Moyers et al., 2004).

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.