Skip to main content
. 2006 Jul;23(7):503–508. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.028456

Table 1 Published randomised trials on the use of heat in the treatment of marine envenomation.

Study N/Type Group Intervention Outcome Comments
Thomas et al8 133 Swimmers with box Pain scores at 0, 5 and 10 minutes: Poor randomisation technique
2001 Randomised jellyfish (Carybdea Hot pack v cold pack 42.3 to 31.3 to 27.5* v 38.3 to 32.8* to 36.2 due to practical difficulties
controlled alata) stings Cold pack v placebo 38.3 to 32.8* to 36.2 v 38.6 to 37.7 to 38.2 Inadequate blinding
trial Hot pack v placebo 42.3 to 31.3* to 27.5* v 38.6 to 37.7 to 38.2 Altered outcome measures
(*p<0.05) after starting trial (changed
Cessation of pain—odds ratio (95% CI): definition of pain cessation)
Hot pack 5.2 (1.3 to 22.8) Not analysed on intention to
Cold pack 0.5 (0.1 to 2.1) treat basis
Placebo 1.0
Nomura et al9 25 (50 stings) Volunteers with box Pain scores at 0, 4, 20 minutes Potentially active substances
2002 Randomised jellyfish (Carybdea Hot water immersion 3.6 to 2.1* to 0.2* (papain or vinegar) used
paired alata) stings Control 3.7 to 3.2 to 1.8 as controls
trial (* p<0.001) No placebo
Loten et al10 96 Swimmers with blue Percentage with reduced pain 10, 20 minutes Possible allocation blas,
2006 Randomised bottle (Physalia) Hot water immersion 53%*, 87%** suggested by the baseline
controlled stings Ice pack 32%, 33% imbalance in initial pain
trial (* p = 0.039; **p = 0.002) severity