Skip to main content
. 2008 Sep 23;99(9):1511–1516. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604678

Table 3. Hazard ratios (HR) for dietary pattern quartiles (Q) in relation to colorectal cancer by stage of disease.

  Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Meat–dim sum pattern
Colorectal cancer
  Cases, N 277 250 225 209
  HRa 1.0 1.01 0.98 0.97
  95% CI   0.85–1.21 0.81–1.18 0.78–1.20
         
Localised disease
  Cases, N 96 94 107 79
  HRa 1.0 1.09 1.30 0.99
  95% CI   0.81–1.45 0.97–1.74 0.69–1.41
         
Advanced disease
  Cases, N 161 140 107 119
  HRa 1.0 0.98 0.81 0.99
  95% CI   0.78–1.24 0.62–1.05 0.74–1.32
         
Vegetable–fruit–soy pattern
Colorectal cancer
  Cases, N 283 243 224 211
  HRa 1.0 1.00 1.01 1.02
  95% CI   0.84–1.19 0.84–1.21 0.83–1.24
         
Localised disease
  Cases, N 101 88 98 89
  HRa 1.0 1.01 1.22 1.16
  95% CI   0.75–1.34 0.91–1.62 0.84–1.59
         
Advanced disease
  Cases, N 161 143 114 109
  HRa 1.0 1.04 0.92 0.95
  95% CI   0.82–1.30 0.71–1.18 0.73–1.25

CI=confidence interval.

a

All HRs were adjusted for age at interview (year), sex, dialect group (Cantonese, Hokkien), interview year (1993–1995, 1996–1998), diabetes at baseline (no, yes), smoking history (never, ‘heavy’ or ⩾13 cigarettes per day starting age <15 years, ‘light’ or non-heavy smokers), body mass index (<20, 20–23.9, 24–27.9, ⩾28 m kg−2), alcohol intake (0, <7, ⩾7 drinks per week), education (no formal education, primary school, secondary school, or higher), any weekly physical activity (no, yes), first-degree relative diagnosed with colorectal cancer (no, yes), and total daily energy intake (kcal).