Table 5.
Pearson Product-moment Correlations between tracking performance (lip and jaw) and perceptual measures of intelligibility, articulatory precision and articulatory defectiveness
Intelligibility | Precision | Defectiveness | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tracking condition | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | NP | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | NP | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | NP |
| ||||||||||||
Best Correlation
| ||||||||||||
Lip | 0.40 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 0.75 | 0.90 | 0.08 | 0.42 | 0.75 | 0.89 | 0.15 |
Jaw | 0.80 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.40 | 0.67 | 0.41 | 0.69 | 0.44 | 0.78 | 0.41 | 0.74 | 0.49 |
| ||||||||||||
Target Tracker Difference
| ||||||||||||
Lip | 0.30 | 0.40 | 0.20 | 0.60 | −0.20 | −0.20 | −0.20 | −0.60 | −0.30 | −0.40 | −0.30 | −0.70 |
Jaw | 0.60 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.50 | −0.50 | −0.10 | −0.20 | −0.60 | −0.60 | −0.30 | −0.20 | −0.60 |
| ||||||||||||
Gain
| ||||||||||||
Lip | 0.40 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.39 | 0.75 | 0.90 | 0.43 | 0.80 | 0.86 | |||
Jaw | 0.70 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.82 | |||
| ||||||||||||
Phase
| ||||||||||||
Lip | 0.50 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.62 | −0.40 | −0.50 | 0.57 | −0.40 | −0.40 | |||
Jaw | 0.10 | 0.70 | 0.00 | −0.30 | −0.60 | 0.00 | −0.10 | −0.70 | 0.01 |
Note: Significant correlations (|r| > 0.60 at α = 0.05) are underlined.