Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Lang. 2008 Jun 16;106(2):98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.05.002

Table 5.

Pearson Product-moment Correlations between tracking performance (lip and jaw) and perceptual measures of intelligibility, articulatory precision and articulatory defectiveness

Intelligibility Precision Defectiveness
Tracking condition 0.3 0.6 0.9 NP 0.3 0.6 0.9 NP 0.3 0.6 0.9 NP

Best Correlation
Lip 0.40 0.80 0.80 0.10 0.30 0.75 0.90 0.08 0.42 0.75 0.89 0.15
Jaw 0.80 0.60 0.70 0.40 0.67 0.41 0.69 0.44 0.78 0.41 0.74 0.49

Target Tracker Difference
Lip 0.30 0.40 0.20 0.60 −0.20 −0.20 −0.20 −0.60 −0.30 −0.40 −0.30 −0.70
Jaw 0.60 0.30 0.20 0.50 −0.50 −0.10 −0.20 −0.60 −0.60 −0.30 −0.20 −0.60

Gain
Lip 0.40 0.80 0.80 0.39 0.75 0.90 0.43 0.80 0.86
Jaw 0.70 0.80 0.80 0.65 0.66 0.73 0.72 0.75 0.82

Phase
Lip 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.62 −0.40 −0.50 0.57 −0.40 −0.40
Jaw 0.10 0.70 0.00 −0.30 −0.60 0.00 −0.10 −0.70 0.01

Note: Significant correlations (|r| > 0.60 at α = 0.05) are underlined.