Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008 Sep;27(9):1275–1287. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2008.922192

TABLE II.

Evaluation of the BMI Performance on Models With Spherical Inclusions of Different Size and Elasticity. The 35-mm-Thick Models Were Made of Base Material Having the Young’s Modulus of 5 kPa With Spherical Inclusions Located at 10 mm Depth

Known Evaluated Inclusion 1
D = 5 mm
E = 20 kPa
Inclusion 2
D = 5 mm
E = 80 kPa
Inclusion 3
D = 10 mm
E = l0 kPa
Inclusion 4
D = 10 mm
E = 40 kPa
Inclusion 5
D = 14 mm
E = 40 kPa
Inclusion 6
D = 14 mm
E = 156 kPa
Inclusion 7
D = 18 mm
E = 20 kPa
Inclusion 8
D = 18 mm
E = 80 kPa
Typical relative error, %
Diameter, mm 5.0 5.3 7.7 9.0 14.6 13.1 17.0 17.2 5
Inclusion Young’s modulus. kPa 20 80 10 42 41 128 20 78 10
Young’s modulus of the base material, kPa 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.0 5.6 5.2 5.9 6.5 19
Heterogeneity of the model body, kPa 0.01 0.08 0.06 0.23 0.35 0.28 0.58 0.50 10