Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Nov 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Periodontol. 2007 Oct;78(10):1887–1896. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.070072

Table 1.

Effect of Systemic Administration of AZM in Combination With Surgery or Surgery Alone on Overall PD, CAL, and Percentage of Sites With BOP (mean ± SEM) for Surgery and Non-Surgery Teeth

Tooth Type Parameter Baseline 3 Months (change)* 6 Months (change)*
Surgery teeth PD (mm) T: 3.10 ± 0.34 T: − 1.03 ± 0.01 T: − 0.83 ± 0.10
C: 3.21 ± 0.65 C: − 1.02 ± 0.24 C: − 0.98 ± 0.03
CAL (mm) T: 3.26 ± 0.72 T: − 0.22 ± 0.02 T: − 0.26 ± 0.00
C: 3.59 ± 1.13 C: − 0.30 ± 0.07 C: − 0.03 ± 0.07
BOP (% of sites) T: 66 ± 21 T: − 32 ± 6 T: − 22 ± 4
C: 61 ± 20 C: − 26 ± 9 C: − 27 ± 1
Non-surgery teeth PD (mm) T: 2.80 ± 0.32 T: − 0.27 ± 0.04
C: 3.01 ± 0.62 C: − 0.39 ± 0.22
CAL (mm) T: 2.96 ± 0.84 T: − 0.27 ± 0.11
C: 3.57 ± 1.26 C: − 0.16 ± 0.09
BOP (% of sites) T: 49 ± 17 T: − 13 ± 3
C: 48 ± 21 C: − 15 ± 1

T = test group; C = control group.

*

A negative value indicates improvement.

Statistical significance between baseline and observed time point.