Skip to main content
. 2008 Nov;180(3):1275–1288. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.089433

Figure 7.—

Figure 7.—

Figure 7.—

Comparison of silencing transmission capacity for oocytes and sperm. (A) Genetic scheme. We first selected one injected animal (I0) to produce F1 and F2 descendants by self-fertilization. We then selected one F2 animal with a large brood size to separately assess sperm and oocyte transmission of silencing. (B) Results of sperm/oocyte comparison. F3 cross-progeny animals were scored individually (7 animals for oocyte transmission and 6 for sperm transmission). F4 descendants were scored in groups of siblings rather than individually since our previous experiments (Figure 2) indicated a consistent F4 bottleneck. In the oocyte experiments, only 2 of 7 F3 animals had progeny: 1 animal had 48 progeny and 1 animal had 1 progeny. None of the F4 animals had F5 progeny. In contrast, in the sperm-transmission experiments, all 6 F3 animals had viable progeny, with brood sizes ranging from 28 to 80. We used groups of F4 animals from sperm transmission and found 26/26 plates with 10 animals to a plate to have viable progeny. To analyze the F5 silencing, we checked the F4 plates for fertile F5 animals. We found 2/26 plates with viable F5 progeny.